sports: recent publications

Why Able-Bodied Athletes Should Be Allowed to Play Adaptive Sports

This past weekend, I flew out to Colorado for the Wheelchair Lacrosse Nationals tournament. While it was an overall great weekend and our team came in second out of the nine teams there, one comment made by an opposing team still leaves a bitter taste in my mouth.

At one point during a game, a comment made from the opposing team to my able-bodied coach left my coach rattled. The comment was about letting disabled athletes play instead of able-bodied athletes because it’s an adaptive sport.

I know I’m not the strongest player on my team. I told my coach before the tournament that I’d rather win than have a ton of playing time. I am OK with my current role on the team being to help the more advanced players on our team practice, and to give them breaks during the game as needed. It is only my first year on the team and I know I have lots of room for growth.

The rule book for wheelchair lacrosse states that each team is allowed to have up to three able-bodied athletes play at a time. While this may be due to the fact that wheelchair lacrosse is still a relatively new sport and more athletes are needed in general to have full teams, I believe that in the long term, even when more disabled athletes decide to play, able-bodied athletes still should be allowed to play the game.

Why is that? While I know I may not hold the popular opinion on this one, hear me out. My belief is that a) disability is a grey zone and not black and white, and b) separating able-bodied athletes from disabled athletes completely in adaptive sports further stigmatizes and puts disabled people in an “other” category than able-bodied athletes.

In other adaptive sports, such as wheelchair rugby and wheelchair basketball, each athlete is assigned a point

people mindfulness sports

All articles where sports is mentioned